From the rolling hills of California to the coastlines of New England, our natural resources are facing increasing threats from pollution and development. However, environmental law has become a powerful tool in protecting the planet and its inhabitants. In this blog post, we will take a closer look at some high-stakes cases where environmental law has been put into action and made an impact on our world. Join us as we explore how legal battles have helped preserve endangered species, safeguard clean drinking water, and combat climate change. Get ready to be inspired by these incredible stories of individuals using their legal expertise to protect the environment for generations to come!

The Trump Administration’s Environmental Rulings

The Trump Administration has issued a number of environmental rulings that have had a significant impact on the way the government regulates environmental matters. One such ruling is the repeal of the Obama-era Clean Power Plan, which was aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. The Trump administration also withdrew from the Paris Agreement, which sought to reduce greenhouse gas emissions globally. In recent months, the Trump administration has also imposed a number of tariffs on imported goods, including solar panels and steel products, in an effort to protect American jobs. The impacts of these rulings are still being felt by society and the environment, and legal experts are working hard to understand and predict how they will play out.

The State of California

Environmental law in action: high-stakes cases and their impact

In today’s legal world, environmental law can seem complex and overwhelming. But the reality is that disputes over natural resources – including air, water, land, and wildlife – are often decided through court proceedings. And these court battles can have a far-reaching impact on public health and the environment.

A recent example of this is the dispute between California and Arizona over the latter state’s attempt to build a border wall. The case made its way all the way to the United States Supreme Court, which issued a ruling earlier this year calling for the construction of barriers along the US-Mexico border to be stopped.

Advertisement

This case highlights just one aspect of environmental law – that it can be highly politicized. In many instances, issues surrounding natural resources are proxies for broader political disagreements between states. This makes litigation around them an increasingly important tool for environmentalists looking to protect critical ecosystems from destruction.

The consequences of these disputes don’t stop there, either. When businesses or governments fail to comply with environmental laws, they can end up costing people their jobs or violating their constitutional rights. In other words, environmental law isn’t just about preserving nature; it’s also about protecting human rights and ensuring that everyone plays by the same rules – no matter where they live.

The Fate of the Oregon Coast

The fate of the Oregon Coast may hinge on a decision by the US Supreme Court this term in a case known as Sackett v. Oregon. The case involves the legality of using the so-called “hammer method” to remove sea stacks and other coastal features, which can damage fragile habitats and harm marine life.

If the high court rules in favor of Sackett, it could pave the way for more widespread destruction of Oregon’s coastline. But if Oregon is able to successfully prove that its coast has been damaged beyond repair as a result of past coastal destruction, then state law could allow for more aggressive restoration measures.

This complex and high-stakes legal battle is being closely watched by environmentalists and coastal communities alike, as it could have a significant impact on how much undeveloped coastline remains in the United States – and what kind ofdamage humans can do to nature without facing legal consequences.

Advertisement

Native American Tribes and the Endangered Species Act

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is a federal law that protects endangered and threatened species and their habitats. The ESA has been broadly successful in conserving America’s wildlife, but it has also come under fire in recent years. The ESA is often criticized for its complex implementation and enforcement process.

The vast majority of endangered species listed under the ESA are Native American tribes’ traditional hunting and fishing grounds. Tribes have long argued that the federal government has not complied with environmental laws in a meaningful way on tribal lands. In April of this year, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the Crow Tribe of Montana. The tribe is challenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to list the Greater Sage-Grouse as an endangered species.

Tribes have also fought other proposed protections for threatened or endangered animals on tribal lands, such as measures to ban mining and drilling on public lands near Yellowstone National Park or to protect wolves from persecution by livestock owners on tribal land in Wyoming. Tensions between tribes and federal agencies over how to implement environmental laws have created some high-stakes cases that could have broad implications for how these laws are enforced on Indian Country.

Conclusion

Looking to get a handle on the complex and rapidly changing landscape of environmental law? Check out our Environmental Law in Action course, offered by the UCLA School of Law. In this two-day course, you’ll explore high-stakes cases from around the world, as well as their impact on public opinion and policymaking. Whether you’re a businessperson or just want to be more informed about how your actions affect the environment, this is an essential course for you.

Advertisement