Connect with us


Cheniere Doubles Down On US Gas Exports as Demand Remains Strong



Cheniere Doubles Down On US Gas Exports as Demand Remains Strong

Cheniere Energy Inc. has been the leading natural gas exporter in the United States for years now, with no signs of slowing down. In 2020, Cheniere doubled down on their US gas exports by signing two long-term deals with two of Europe’s biggest utilities. These deals demonstrate Chenier’s commitment to meeting increasing global demand for natural gas and solidifies their position as an industry leader in the space. In this blog post, we will explore Cheniere’s recent moves and discuss why US natural gas exports remain so strong despite the pandemic. We will also examine what impact these developments have on the US energy landscape and how other companies can benefit from similar initiatives.

Who is Cheniere?

Cheniere Energy is one of the leading developers, owners and operators of liquefied natural gas (LNG) assets in the United States. The company owns and operates the Sabine Pass LNG terminal in Louisiana, which is the first large-scale LNG export facility in North America.

In addition to its Sabine Pass facility, Cheniere also has two other LNG export terminals under construction: Corpus Christi LNG in Texas and Cameron LNG in Louisiana. Both of these terminals are expected to come online by 2019.


Once all three terminals are operational, Cheniere will have a combined export capacity of over 30 million tonnes per annum (mtpa). This will make it the largest LNG exporter in the United States.

Cheniere’s expansion into the LNG export market comes as global demand for natural gas continues to grow. According to the International Energy Agency, global demand for natural gas is expected to increase by nearly 50% by 2030.

With its three world-class LNG export facilities, Cheniere is well positioned to meet this growing demand.

What is LNG?

LNG, or liquefied natural gas, is a versatile fuel that can be used for electricity generation, heating, and transportation. LNG is produced by cooling natural gas to -260°F (-162°C), at which point it becomes a liquid. This process reduces the volume of natural gas by up to 600 times, making it easier to store and transport.


LNG is typically transported by tanker ship and must be kept cold during transit. Once it reaches its destination, it is regasified and can be used as a clean-burning fuel for power generation, home heating, and transportation.

LNG is an increasingly popular fuel choice due to its low emissions and high efficiency. In fact, LNG emits up to 60% less carbon dioxide than coal when used for electricity generation. Additionally, LNG is a versatile fuel that can be used in a variety of applications including power generation, transportation, and home heating.

What are the benefits of exporting LNG?

As the world looks to decarbonize its energy mix, gas – and specifically LNG – is playing an increasingly important role. Not only is gas cleaner than coal when burned, but the rise of renewables has created a need for flexible “dispatchable” power that can be called on when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing. This has led to strong demand for US LNG exports, which are expected to grow from around 10 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in 2019 to over 30 Bcf/d by 2030.

There are a number of reasons why exporting LNG makes sense for the United States:


1) Gas is abundant and relatively cheap in the United States thanks to the shale revolution. This abundance has driven down domestic gas prices, making US LNG exports competitive in global markets.

2) Exporting LNG provides an important outlet for excess gas production, helping to avoid potential supply gluts and price collapses in domestic markets.

3) The growing demand for LNG globally creates an opportunity for the United States to capitalize on its strategic location and well-developed infrastructure.

4) Selling LNG abroad helps to improve the trade balance, as export revenues exceed import costs. This is an important consideration at a time when the United States is looking to reduce its trade deficit.

5) Exporting LNG supports jobs throughout the supply chain, from exploration and


Who are Cheniere’s customers?

As the leading exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the United States, Cheniere Energy serves customers all over the world. In 2019, Cheniere shipped LNG to customers in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East.

One of Cheniere’s most notable customers is British Petroleum (BP), which signed a 20-year contract with Cheniere in 2011 for the purchase of LNG. Under the deal, BP will buy up to 3 million tons of LNG per year from Cheniere’s Sabine Pass facility in Louisiana.

Other major customers of Cheniere include Total SA, Shell, and South Korea’s KOGAS. Together, these four companies accounted for over 60% of Cheniere’s LNG exports in 2019.

How has the pandemic affected LNG demand?


The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound effect on LNG demand, with global consumption falling by around 15% in 2020. This is largely due to economic activity slowing down in many countries, as businesses have been forced to close their doors and people have been confined to their homes. This has led to a reduction in energy consumption, as factories and power plants have been idled and transportation has been limited.

While the pandemic has caused a drop in demand for LNG, Cheniere remains bullish on the prospects for US gas exports. The company is investing heavily in new export terminals, betting that the long-term fundamentals for natural gas remain strong. There is growing demand for cleaner-burning fuels like natural gas, as countries look to transition away from coal and oil. And with the US shale boom showing no signs of slowing down, there is an abundance of cheap gas available for export.

Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, Cheniere is doubling down on its bet that US gas exports will remain strong in the years to come.

What’s next for Cheniere?

As the leading exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the United States, Cheniere is well-positioned to take advantage of the growing demand for LNG around the world.


In the short-term, Cheniere is focused on completing construction of its Sabine Pass Liquefaction Facility in Louisiana and bringing it into full commercial operation. Once operational, the facility will have a nominal production capacity of approximately 4.5 million metric tons per annum of LNG.

Looking further ahead, Cheniere is actively pursuing opportunities to expand its liquefaction capacity at its Sabine Pass facility and build additional export facilities elsewhere in North America. With strong demand for LNG expected to continue, Cheniere is well-positioned to grow its business and become an even more important player in the global LNG market.


Cheniere’s decision to double down on US gas exports shows that the demand for US natural gas remains strong. With its advanced infrastructure and vast reserves of inexpensive natural gas, Cheniere is well-positioned to take advantage of this increasing demand. The company’s dedication to providing clean, affordable energy will help ensure that the United States maintains a competitive edge in global markets and keeps up with rising consumer demands for green energy sources.


Continue Reading


There are risks lurking in the world of private capital




Private capital has emerged as a vital component of the global financial landscape, offering significant returns and opportunities for diversification. However, beneath the allure of high returns and exclusive investment opportunities lie several risks that investors need to be acutely aware of. This article delves into the hidden risks associated with private capital, providing an analysis and comparative overview to better understand these dangers.

Understanding Private Capital


Image by jcomp on Freepik

Private capital refers to investments in private equity, venture capital, private debt, and other non-publicly traded assets. These investments are typically characterized by their lack of liquidity, higher risk profiles, and potential for substantial returns. Investors in private capital include institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and accredited investors who seek to diversify their portfolios and capture alpha.

Types of Private Capital

  1. Private Equity: Investments in private companies or buyouts of public companies that result in their delisting.
  2. Venture Capital: Investments in early-stage companies with high growth potential but also significant risk.
  3. Private Debt: Loans provided to companies or individuals that are not issued or traded on public markets.
  4. Real Assets: Investments in physical assets like real estate, infrastructure, and commodities.

Major Risks in Private Capital Investments

Liquidity Risk

Private capital investments are notoriously illiquid. Unlike publicly traded stocks, these investments cannot be easily sold or converted into cash. Investors are typically locked into these investments for extended periods, often ranging from several years to over a decade. This illiquidity can pose significant challenges, especially during times of financial distress when immediate access to funds may be necessary.

Market Risk

Market risk in private capital is influenced by economic cycles, industry trends, and geopolitical events. Unlike publicly traded securities, private capital investments are less transparent, making it difficult to gauge their market value accurately. Economic downturns can lead to reduced valuations and exits, impacting the overall returns on investment.

Management Risk

The performance of private capital investments heavily relies on the expertise and decisions of fund managers. Poor management decisions, lack of experience, or even unethical practices can lead to substantial losses. Investors must conduct thorough due diligence on fund managers and their track records before committing capital.

Operational Risk

Operational risks pertain to failures in the internal processes, people, and systems within an investment firm. These risks include mismanagement, fraud, and administrative errors. Given the private nature of these investments, operational risks can be more challenging to identify and mitigate compared to public market investments.

Regulatory Risk

Private capital investments are subject to regulatory changes that can impact their profitability and operations. Changes in tax laws, investment regulations, and international trade policies can all have significant effects on the returns of private capital investments. Keeping abreast of regulatory environments is crucial for investors.


Valuation Risk

Accurately valuing private capital investments is inherently challenging due to the lack of market prices. The valuation process often involves subjective judgments and assumptions, leading to potential overvaluation or undervaluation. Incorrect valuations can mislead investors about the true worth of their investments.

Comparative Analysis of Private Capital Risks

To better understand the risks in the world of private capital, let’s compare them across different types of private capital investments.

Risk Type Private Equity Venture Capital Private Debt Real Assets
Liquidity Risk High (long-term lock-up periods) Very High (early-stage companies) Moderate (can be structured loans) Moderate to High (depends on asset type)
Market Risk Moderate to High (economic cycles) Very High (high volatility) Moderate (depends on borrower credit) Moderate (subject to market conditions)
Management Risk High (dependence on fund managers) Very High (reliance on founders) Moderate (depends on lender expertise) Moderate to High (depends on asset mgmt)
Operational Risk Moderate (established companies) High (start-ups, unproven models) Moderate (operational complexities) Moderate (operational efficiency)
Regulatory Risk Moderate (subject to changes) High (innovative, new industries) Moderate (financial regulations) High (zoning, environmental laws)
Valuation Risk High (subjective valuations) Very High (uncertain future value) Moderate to High (credit evaluations) Moderate to High (market valuations)

Case Studies Highlighting Private Capital Risks

Case Study 1: WeWork (Venture Capital)

WeWork, a high-profile venture capital-backed company, faced significant valuation risk. Initially valued at nearly $47 billion, its valuation plummeted to below $10 billion following its failed IPO in 2019. The drastic revaluation highlighted the inherent valuation risks and management risks in venture capital investments. Investors lost significant capital due to mismanagement and overvaluation.

Case Study 2: Abraaj Group (Private Equity)

Abraaj Group, once a leading private equity firm, collapsed in 2018 due to allegations of mismanagement and misappropriation of funds. The case underscores the management and operational risks in private equity investments. Investors suffered heavy losses as the firm’s unethical practices and operational failures came to light.

Case Study 3: Real Estate Market Collapse (Real Assets)

The 2008 financial crisis demonstrated the market and liquidity risks in real asset investments, particularly in real estate. Property values plummeted, and the lack of liquidity meant investors were unable to exit their positions without incurring substantial losses. Regulatory changes post-crisis also affected the real estate market, highlighting regulatory risks.


Mitigating Risks in Private Capital Investments

Due Diligence

Thorough due diligence is essential before investing in private capital. This includes evaluating the fund managers’ track record, understanding the investment strategy, and analyzing the financial health of target companies or assets.


Diversifying investments across different types of private capital and sectors can mitigate some of the risks. By not putting all eggs in one basket, investors can cushion the impact of adverse events on their overall portfolio.

Active Monitoring

Regular monitoring of investments and staying informed about market conditions and regulatory changes can help investors manage and mitigate risks. Active engagement with fund managers and periodic review of investment performance are crucial.

Structured Exit Strategies

Having clear exit strategies can help manage liquidity risk. Investors should be aware of the potential exit options and timelines for their investments and plan accordingly.


While private offers the potential for high returns and diversification benefits, it is fraught with various risks that can lead to significant financial losses. Investors must be aware of the liquidity, market, management, operational, regulatory, and valuation risks associated with these investments. Through diligent due diligence, diversification, active monitoring, and structured exit strategies, investors can better navigate the complexities of private and protect their investments.


Understanding these risks and implementing robust risk management strategies are essential for anyone considering investments in the private space. By doing so, investors can harness the opportunities that private capital presents while safeguarding their financial interests.


Continue Reading


US Tech Sector Pressures Chinese Venture Capital to Divest



American Currency

The ongoing technological rivalry between the United States and China has escalated into a multi-faceted conflict impacting various sectors, with venture capital (VC) investments being a critical battleground. The US tech sector, bolstered by regulatory and policy measures from the government, is pressuring Chinese venture capitalists to divest from American technology companies. This article explores the reasons behind this pressure, the mechanisms being used, and the potential implications for both the US and Chinese tech landscapes.

Background: The US-China Tech Rivalry

Image by from Pixabay

The technological competition between the US and China has intensified over the past decade, driven by both countries’ desires to dominate key areas such as artificial intelligence (AI), 5G, and quantum computing. This rivalry has led to a series of policy measures, tariffs, and sanctions aimed at protecting national security and maintaining technological superiority. The US government, in particular, has become increasingly wary of Chinese investments in its tech sector, fearing that these could lead to espionage, intellectual property theft, and undue influence.

Reasons Behind the Pressure

National Security Concerns

One of the primary reasons for the US pressure on Chinese VC divestment is national security. The US government fears that Chinese investments in American tech companies could be used to access sensitive information and technologies. This concern has been amplified by high-profile cases of intellectual property theft and cyber-espionage attributed to Chinese actors.

Economic Competition

The US aims to maintain its leadership in key technological areas. By limiting Chinese investments, the US hopes to stifle the growth of Chinese tech firms that might benefit from advanced American technologies. This strategy is part of a broader effort to ensure that the US retains its competitive edge in the global tech market.

Regulatory and Legislative Actions

The US government has implemented a series of measures to curb Chinese investments. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has been particularly active in scrutinizing and blocking deals deemed to pose a risk to national security. Additionally, recent legislative efforts, such as the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA), have expanded CFIUS’s powers to include minority investments and other non-controlling stakes.

Mechanisms of Pressure

Increased Scrutiny and Restrictions

US regulatory bodies, particularly CFIUS, have ramped up their scrutiny of Chinese investments in tech firms. This has led to an increase in blocked deals and forced divestments. Companies receiving Chinese investments are now subject to more rigorous reviews, making it more difficult for Chinese capital to flow into the US tech sector.


Blacklisting and Sanctions

The US has also employed blacklisting and sanctions as tools to exert pressure. Chinese tech giants like Huawei and ZTE have been added to the Entity List, restricting their access to American technology and capital. This tactic not only impacts the targeted companies but also serves as a warning to other firms considering Chinese investments.

Diplomatic and Economic Measures

Beyond direct regulatory actions, the US has used diplomatic channels to pressure allies and partners to adopt similar measures. By building a coalition of like-minded countries, the US aims to create a broader front against Chinese technological influence.

Impact on Chinese Venture Capital

Forced Divestments and Withdrawals

As a result of the increased pressure, many Chinese VCs have been forced to divest from US tech companies. High-profile cases include divestments from major startups and technology firms, which have had to seek alternative sources of funding to replace the withdrawn Chinese capital.

Shifts in Investment Strategies

Chinese venture capitalists are adapting their strategies in response to the hostile environment. Many are redirecting their investments to other regions, such as Europe and Southeast Asia, where regulatory scrutiny is less intense. Others are focusing more on domestic investments within China, fueling the growth of the local tech ecosystem.

Impact on the US Tech Sector

Funding Gaps and Challenges

The withdrawal of Chinese capital has created funding gaps for some US tech companies, particularly startups and early-stage firms that rely heavily on venture funding. While alternative sources of capital, such as domestic VCs and institutional investors, have stepped in to fill some of these gaps, the transition has not been seamless.


Strengthened Regulatory Environment

The increased scrutiny on foreign investments has led to a more robust regulatory environment in the US tech sector. While this helps protect national security and intellectual property, it also adds layers of complexity and bureaucracy for tech companies seeking investment.

Long-Term Implications

In the long run, the pressure on Chinese VCs to divest could lead to a more insular and protectionist tech ecosystem in the US. This shift may hinder the global flow of capital and innovation, potentially slowing down technological advancements.

Comparative Analysis

Investment Trends Before and After Pressure

Aspect Before Pressure (Pre-2018) After Pressure (Post-2018)
Chinese VC Activity High investment in US startups and tech firms Significant reduction in new investments
Regulatory Scrutiny Moderate, with few blocked deals High, with increased deal scrutiny and blockages
Funding Availability Abundant, diverse sources including Chinese VCs Reduced, reliance on domestic and non-Chinese sources
Tech Sector Growth Robust, fueled by diverse international funding Slowed, adjusting to reduced Chinese capital
Strategic Alliances US and Chinese firms often collaborated Collaboration reduced, shift to alternative partners

Comparative Table of US and Chinese Responses

Aspect US Response Chinese Response
Investment Regulation Strengthened CFIUS reviews, FIRRMA legislation Increased scrutiny on foreign investments
Strategic Focus Protecting national security, tech dominance Strengthening domestic tech sector, seeking alternative markets
Capital Flow Adjustments Reduced Chinese VC inflow Redirected investments to Europe, Southeast Asia
Tech Sector Adaptations Seeking alternative funding, regulatory compliance Boosting local innovation, partnerships with non-US firms
Long-term Strategy Maintain tech leadership, secure investments Achieve self-reliance, reduce dependency on US technology


The US tech sector’s pressure on Chinese venture capital to divest reflects the broader geopolitical and economic tensions between the two superpowers. While aimed at protecting national security and maintaining technological dominance, these measures have significant implications for the global tech ecosystem. The resulting shifts in investment strategies and regulatory environments highlight the complex interplay between politics and technology. As both nations navigate this challenging landscape, the global flow of capital and innovation will continue to evolve, potentially reshaping the future of the tech industry.


Continue Reading


Driving Savings: Discovering Florida’s Most Affordable Commercial Auto Insurance



Affordable Commercial Auto Insurance


Welcome to “Driving Savings,” your roadmap to discovering the most affordable commercial auto insurance options in Florida. As a business owner in the Sunshine State, optimizing your insurance costs while ensuring adequate coverage for your vehicles is crucial. Join us as we unveil tips for uncovering cost-effective rates, comparing coverage options, and driving your business forward with savings in mind.

1. Embracing Cost-Effective Solutions:

Affordable Commercial Auto Insurance

This image is taken from

Cost-effective commercial auto insurance is essential for businesses in Florida to manage their finances while safeguarding their vehicles. By prioritizing affordability without compromising coverage quality, you can unlock significant savings and ensure the financial sustainability of your operations.

2. Tips for Finding Affordable Rates:

Explore these strategies for securing the most affordable commercial auto insurance rates in Florida:

  • Shop around and compare quotes from multiple insurance providers to find the best rates.
  • Consider adjusting coverage limits and deductibles to lower premiums while maintaining adequate protection.
  • Take advantage of discounts offered by insurers, such as bundling policies or implementing safety measures.
  • Maintain a clean driving record and encourage safe driving practices among your employees to qualify for lower rates.

3. Evaluating Coverage Options:

While prioritizing affordability, it’s crucial to assess coverage options to ensure your business vehicles are adequately protected. Consider essential coverage types such as liability, collision, and comprehensive, and tailor your policy to meet your specific needs while staying within budget constraints.

4. Assessing Insurance Providers:

Affordable Commercial Auto Insurance

This image is taken from

When comparing insurance providers, consider factors such as:

  • Reputation and reliability in the industry
  • Range of coverage options and flexibility
  • Customer service and claims handling reputation
  • Transparency in pricing and affordability By evaluating these aspects, you can select an insurer that offers the most affordable rates without compromising on service quality.

5. Utilizing Online Tools and Resources:

Leverage online insurance comparison tools and resources to streamline your search for affordable commercial auto insurance in Florida. These platforms allow you to quickly compare quotes from multiple providers, making it easier to identify the best coverage options at the most competitive rates.

6. Conclusion:

Driving savings with affordable commercial auto insurance in Florida is achievable with careful research and comparison. By implementing the strategies outlined in this guide, you can uncover cost-effective rates, compare coverage options, and ensure that your business vehicles are adequately protected without overspending.

In conclusion, “Driving Savings” emphasizes the importance of discovering affordable commercial auto insurance options in Florida. With the right approach and considerations, you can secure the most cost-effective rates while maintaining the coverage your business needs to thrive, allowing you to focus on driving your business forward with confidence.


Continue Reading

Readers like you help support Contrank. When you make a purchase using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read More.